Final Work
"Sin_k" (2009)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmKwJXFzoaI
Contemporary Dance Animation Studies: A blog which shall record my observations and discoveries in emergence, spontaneous-order, collective intelligence, complex adaptive systems and cybernetics. Using time and [virtual 3D] space as the medium, I shall be exploring thresholds of abstraction in the human form and the potential of emotion in abstract animated forms.
"Sin_k" (2009)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TmKwJXFzoaI
Posted by Joseph Jujnovich at 14:38 0 comments
"If the primary stuff of music is sound, which I believe, then notation, no matter how ordinary or idiosyncratic, is no more than a representation of the real thing.
Furthermore a description of notation such as this is a symbolic representation of a symbolic representation - twice removed from reality."
Lejaren A. Hiller, Jnr
[sourced from John Cage's Notations (link to PDF of book)]
Posted by Joseph Jujnovich at 14:13 0 comments
Labels: notation
FractalAbyss
P:0 / site
Genr8
LandonGray - fractal plugin
L-System Plugin
Voronoi Diagrams:
These kinda act like waves interacting with slightly submerged objects.
Mathematica
Voronoi Algorithms
Architecture Students:
Southern California Institute of Architecture
Posted by Joseph Jujnovich at 14:43 0 comments
Notation as a Tool of Thought - pdf
This guy won an award for this lecture.
Posted by Joseph Jujnovich at 12:28 0 comments
Labels: algorithms, code, notation
OK. I think I am finally ready to begin experimenting from the research. I have narrowed the focus down to a few select areas, and shall start modeling and coding tomorrow.
Wish me luck! :)
Posted by Joseph Jujnovich at 00:12 1 comments
Here are some of the books on mathematics in nature and architecture that I am looking into. Have been playing around with mel scripts from the first book.
Algorithmic Architecture - Kostas Terzidis - pdf - Brilliant book. Includes mel scripts.
The Algorithmic Beauty of Plants - P. Prucinkiewicz, A. Lindenmayer - pdf - From the guy who coined the term 'L-systems' [Linenmayer-systems] comes a book that decodes the creation of plants using mathematical algorithms.
On Growth and Form - D'Arcy Wentworth Thompson - pdf - Huge book that analyzes how organic forms are created in nature. Now in the public domain.
Enjoy.
Posted by Joseph Jujnovich at 23:55 0 comments
Labels: algorithms, architecture, nature
- Created by "The OpenEnded Group" -
Description taken from the site:
[link]
Field is a software project initiated by OpenEnded Group, for the creation of their digital artworks. It is an environment for writing code to rapidly and experimentally assemble and explore algorithmic systems. It is visual, it is hybrid, it is code-based. We think that it has something to offer a diverse range of programmers and artists.
Field is a development environment for experimental code and digital art in the broadest of possible senses. While there are a great many development environments and digital art tools out there today, this one has been constructed with two key principles in mind:
Embrace and extend — rather than make a personal, private and pristine code utopia, Field tries to bridge to as many libraries, programming languages, and ways of doing things as possible. The world doesn't necessarily need another programming language or serial port library, nor do we have to pick and choose between data-flow systems, graphical user interfaces or purely textual programming — we can have it all in the right environment and we can both leverage the work of others and take control of our own tools and methods.
Live code makes anything possible — Field tries to replace as many "features" with editable code as it can. Its programming language of choice is Python — a world class, highly respected and incredibly flexible language. As such, Field is intensely customizable, with the glue between interface objects and data modifiable inside Field itself. Field takes seriously the idea that its user — you — are a programmer / artist doing serious work and that you should be able to reconfigure your tools to suit your domain and style as closely as possible.
Posted by Joseph Jujnovich at 14:58 0 comments
This artist [Gary Hill] has created works which demonstrate spatial ambiguity.
Defining dimension and depth is difficult.
Links:
Slought.com exhibition listing, including audio file link:
Art of Limina: Gary Hill
An essay on Gary Hill's work:
Up Against Time - pdf
Posted by Joseph Jujnovich at 14:48 0 comments
Labels: ambiguity
As I shall be choreographing motion, I feel it necessary to research what forms of notation for movement already exist.
Here are some links:
MovementWriting
Movement Notation - with free lesson upon sign-up.
Labanotation
- Laban Software
Action Stroke Dance Notation - brilliant codes for notating dance. Extensive descriptions and tutorials.
Benesh:
Benesh Open Source
Benesh main site
- Benesh Notation tutorial
And here's a brilliant thesis by Dr. Royce Neagle that appears to have extensive research in applying notation to animation or digital format:
Emotion by Motion: Expression Simulation in Virtual Ballet - pdf
Posted by Joseph Jujnovich at 13:37 0 comments
Labels: choreography, code, notation
An interview with digital artist Paul Kaiser talks with choreographer William Forsythe about the potential of computers and algorithms for the future of dance choreography.
Here's some excerpts:
William: So I began to imagine lines in space that could be bent, or tossed, or otherwise distorted. By moving from a point to a line to a plane to a volume, I was able to visualize a geometric space composed of points that were vastly interconnected. As these points were all contained within the dancer's body, there was really no transition necessary, only a series of "foldings" and "unfoldings" that produced an infinite number of movements and positions. From these, we started making catalogues of what the body could do. And for every new piece that we choreographed, we would develop a new series of procedures.
Some choreographers create dance from emotional impulses, while others, like Balanchine, work from a strictly musical standpoint. My own dances reflect the body's experiences in space, which I try to connect through algorithms. So there's this fascinating overlap with computer programming.
For Eidos, I gave my dancers and myself the following general instruction: "Take an equation, solve it; take the result and fold it back into the equation and then solve it again. Keep doing this a million times".
Paul: That’s where your focus on spatial procedures and the architecture of movement maps so well onto computer algorithms and virtual spaces. As you said before, it’s as if we’re all on the same quest.
William: How do you define that quest?
Paul: Shelley and I have spoken about it as the search for a new art form, which seems about to emerge from this odd confluence of the dance, visual art, and computer worlds. I imagine that in this new form, performance and recording and notation ‘ three strands of the performing arts that have always been separate ‘ will be fused. So that you can have the notation shaping the performance, the performance shaping the recording, the recording shaping the notation, and so on. Perhaps this new process, which builds on itself, can bootstrap a new way of making art.
William: Where I’d start is with the score. What’s been missing so far is an intelligent kind of notation, one that would let us generate dances from a vast number of varied inputs. Not traditional notation, but a new kind mediated by the computer.
Posted by Joseph Jujnovich at 12:31 0 comments
Posted by Joseph Jujnovich at 21:19 0 comments
Observations on the weather and it's relation to my Grandmother's passing.
--
Saturday - Gloomy -
Posted by Joseph Jujnovich at 21:50 0 comments
Healing through Connections - strength in numbers
Posted by Joseph Jujnovich at 21:43 0 comments
Remy: [Django starts to walk away] No.
Django: What?
Remy: No. Dad I don't believe it. You're telling me that the future is - can only be more of *this*?
Django: This is the way things are. You can't change nature.
Remy: Change is nature, Dad. The part that we can influence. And it starts when we decide.
Django: [Remy turns to leave] Where are you going?
Remy: With luck, forward.
Posted by Joseph Jujnovich at 21:22 0 comments
Posted by Joseph Jujnovich at 17:09 0 comments
--
Blogs:
Fractal Ontology: Politics, Cybernetics, Philosophy
http://slought.org/content/11421/
INSPIRATION:
Pruned - check data structures
http://www.dataisnature.com/- brilliant articles and links to books.
Rice Gallery, Houston, Texas - Check the Rip Curl Canyon
Deleuze and the use of genetic algorithm in architecture
Biothing.org
www.colinkeefe.net
Posted by Joseph Jujnovich at 16:43 0 comments
Where Architecture Meets Biology: An Interview with Detlef Mertins (2007)
One of the ideas that comes to the fore at that moment is that form is not an a priori; it's not predetermined. Form is seen as the result of a process. That opens the door to the question of what kind of processes and media or means are involved in the making of form."
"What is your name?"
"How is your name?" (abstract, change this into more correct english...)
Whitehead argues that “organism” is a better term for things that exist. Whereas matter is self-sustaining, externally related, valueless, passive, and without an intrinsic principle of motion; organisms are interdependent, internally and externally related, value-laden, active, and intrinsically active. link
I think Mies [van der Rohe] understood the building as an organism that is at work within its milieu or environment. Just as life forms evolve, so too do architecture and technology. For Mies, architecture needed to achieve a new harmony with its environment, because the environment had been changing in historical and material terms.So architecture that is caring for its environment and inhabitants, buildings that maintain both themselves and their surroundings. As humans maintain both their internal processes and consciously respond to external stimuli, architecture may also step into the role of consciousness. We are beginning to see this type of behaviour inside the virtual world - web applications and browsers that respond to behavioural themes of users. The web is showing evidence of organism-like characteristics. Internet communities emerge with rules that no single person created, yet the rules appear to be ecologically sound.
[Austrian artist-designer Friedrich Kiesler] defines co-realism as the science of the exchange of relationships and forces, which emphasizes the dynamics of continual interaction between humanity and the environment, in which there is little or no distinction made between the natural and the technological.
And he says we shouldn't imitate how nature constructs things; we should be developing what he calls biotechniques that allow us to influence life in a desired direction. For instance, he wants to move from the assembly of structures to continuous construction.
Kiesler wants to develop "the potential of specific actions contained in any nucleus of human physiology, resulting in entirely new functions sustained by inventions." This set of ideas still uses the ecological model of the human organism in its milieu, but now stresses the interactive, dynamic, and inventive dimension of that relationship. Interactions taking place in society, technology, art, every sphere of activity - this is a holistic notion of interactivity. Through interaction, it's possible for us to expand.
"Every form is the frozen instantaneous picture of a process. Thus a work is a stopping-place on the road of becoming and not the fixed goal."
Haeckel is the person who coined the discipline of ecology, as the study of the interrelationship between organisms and their environment. Organisms are also understood to be building their environments. They're making the environment while the environment is making them.
Sculpture doesn't have to have uses, at least not traditional sculpture, other than to inspire and amuse and provoke in its reception. The reception of architecture is in its occupation and performance as well as in its perception. The challenge is to put aside either-or thinking and develop habits of mind that are inclusive. I think interactive art has many lessons for architecture in this.
There's lot of potential, also, in integrating intelligence to make buildings that are responsive. At Penn, Ferda Kolatan is leading an effort to do that, as he has in his own work. All this is on top of the more effective engagement with uses and programming that we've talked about already.
Global warming demands that we take responsibility for other interactivities than we have talked about so far. There is no reason why more buildings can't be generators of energy, rather than just consumers. Why not integrate that goal into the next generation of generative models for design?
That's actually a good bridge into the question of urban dynamics - how architecture can contribute to the growth and development of cities and economies. In a lovely book by the late Jane Jacobs, The Nature of Economies (2000), she describes how economies grow, develop and expand using an ecosystems metaphor. She says it's helpful to think about how energy passes through ecosystems, what kind and how many transformations of energy and matter take place. In desert ecosystems, less happens than in well-developed forest ecosystems. In a desert or a parking lot, sunlight heats things up but doesn't get circulated much and basically disappears. In the forest, energy is circulated in a web of teeming, interdependent and interacting organisms, plants and animals. It's not just converted once but many times, combined and recombined, cycled and recycled, passed around from organism to organism. That's how diversity, intricacy and complexity develop. The flow of energy, she says, is "dilatory and digressive," leaving behind complex webs of life. It's worth thinking about how the design and making of buildings can enrich ecosystems -human as well as natural - by circulating and recirculating energy. Literally in terms of the energy they use or produce. If they produce energy, not only will this offset global warming, but that energy can be sent into the world to circulate more and in more productive ways.
It's time to radically expand the sphere of interactivity and effects that architects engage, to become serious and activist on that front. We need to develop inclusive habits of mind, to embrace the so-called real world, and work towards attaining multiple goals. There are many issues and resources that can be harnessed and brought together with experimental form-making; it's a tremendous horizon. Without bringing all that together, it seems to me that pure, disinterested experiments in form are inadequate to the tasks that face architects today.
Posted by Joseph Jujnovich at 11:25 0 comments
Labels: cybernetics, ecology, emergence
Emergent Architecture, Bioconstructivism, Biosynthesis
I like this description of emergence, taken from EMERGENT Architecture: (company)
An excerpt from EMERGENT's 'about' page:What is Emergence?
In the scientific sense, emergence refers to the process of deriving new and coherent structures, patterns, and properties in a complex system. Emergent phenomena occur due to the pattern of interactions between elements of a system over time. Emergent phenomena are often unexpected, nontrivial results of simple interactions between simple components. What distinguishes a complex system from a merely complicated one is that some behaviors and patterns emerge in complex systems as a result of the patterns of relationships between the elements.An emergent property or behavior is shown when a number of simple agents operate in an environment, forming more complex behaviors as a collective. A system made of several things can host properties which the things themselves do not have. For instance, consider water (H20): hydrogen (H) and oxygen (O) are extremely light gaseous substances at room temperature, while water, the effect of their combination, is a heavy liquid. Liquidity is therefore one of the emergent properties of the system of hydrogen/oxygen. There is nothing about the property of liquidity-- its wetness, hydraulic dynamics, Brownian motion, and potential for heat exchange-- that can be predicted by examining the properties of either H or O.
Emergent properties can arise not only between things in a system, but between other emergent properties. The number and subtlety of these properties can be very much greater than the number of things.
EMERGENT’s approach is informed by contemporary models of biology and systems theory as well as the arts, toward an architecture based on structural pattern formation and emergent behavior. The work is part of a larger contemporary movement in architecture referred to by Detlef Mertins in 2004 as “Bioconstructivism,” where a bias toward material intelligence begins to produce an architecture characterized by its variability and responsiveness to local forces.
The work questions the dialectic of excess and efficiency in architecture, in favor of a more complex understanding of both through biological thinking. The recursive process of random mutation and natural selection in nature provides a model for how a dynamic feedback between excesses and efficiencies can create innovation and elegance. This feedback logic is executed in the office using both generative and analytical algorithms as well as hands-on design techniques.
Key to the work is the phenomenon of ‘emergence’ which offers insight into the way apparently Isolated bodies, particles, or systems exhibit group behavior in coherent but unexpected patterns. The animated beauty of emergent organizations, such as in swarms or hives, points to a range of real architectural potentials where components are always linked and always exchanging information, and above all, where architectural wholes exceed the sum of their parts.
LabStudio 07/08 : Nonlinear Biosynthesis, University of Pennsylvania
Posted by Joseph Jujnovich at 20:02 0 comments